|
|
|
Of |
|
Sales and Customer Care Executives |
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
Merchandise |
|
Holidays |
|
Recognition |
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, the design and implementation of
the scheme has is in most organisations been left to either the HR
Department which does not understand the process of selling. Or the Sales
Department which does not understand the process of motivation |
|
Of course, sometimes neither is in sync with the
overall long-term strategy of the organisation |
|
Short-term, short-sighted incentive schemes are
often the result. |
|
|
|
|
Before we look at some recent innovations and
current concepts about motivation through incentives, let us first quickly
run through the basic steps involved in devising a suitable incentive
scheme. |
|
|
|
|
Any
scientifically designed incentive scheme must be developed by following
certain steps: |
|
Gathering Information |
|
Setting Objectives & Strategies |
|
Engaging the Stakeholders |
|
Designing the Programme |
|
Ensuring Open Communication |
|
Gaining Stakeholders Acceptance |
|
Rolling Out the Plan |
|
Reaching the Goal |
|
|
|
|
Explore various aspects of the business and
their relationship to the selling process |
|
Are all products equally profitable? |
|
Are there strategic reasons to push any
products? |
|
Are target / goal setting processes equitable? |
|
Are territories matched in terms of potential,
geographic spread, number of customers?. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agree on corporate strategies, individual
product strategies, profitability and pricing strategies |
|
Establish critical parameters of the customer
relationship: Is it installation, after sales service, supply of
consumables, linked services, etc |
|
What are the business strategies: penetration,
extension, market spread, repeat demand, exclusivity, segmentation, etc. |
|
|
|
|
Involve the sales reps as well as the sales
managers / executives in the process. Ideally make a task force consisting
of reps from HR, Finance, sales managers and sales reps |
|
This ensures involvement, commitment, acceptance |
|
|
|
Ultimately this task force shall act as the
agents of change to ensure wide acceptance of the new scheme. |
|
|
|
|
Define Objectives: Set Your Goals |
|
Determine your Budget |
|
Measure Progress. Structure the programme |
|
Select your Awards |
|
Run the Programme. |
|
|
|
|
Define Objectives: Set Your Goals: |
|
To change the entire goal setting process |
|
To update the sales incentive budgeting process |
|
Redirecting the selling focus |
|
Redefining sales management styles |
|
Re-leveraging the components of the sales
compensation plan |
|
Aligning sales performance criteria with the
business strategy. |
|
|
|
|
The specific goals could be inter-alia: |
|
Increase sales of specific products |
|
Raise market share |
|
Generate new accounts |
|
Increase customer retention |
|
Improve store displays |
|
Support a simultaneous dealer or consumer
promotion |
|
Enhance morale and team spirit of sales force |
|
Increase customer satisfaction levels. |
|
|
|
|
Determine your Budget |
|
It is imperative at an early stage determine
what percentage of the sales turnover can be spent upon this scheme. Else
there is a danger of runaway costs. Cost of incentives as well as the
administrative cost must be calculated. |
|
Do you want to have an open-ended or a
closed-ended scheme. Or even a plateau scheme, which can also be combined
with other schemes. |
|
|
|
|
How to Measure Progress: Structure the programme |
|
Design and lay down criteria for measuring
progress and performance |
|
This becomes more important when goals are based
on criteria other than sales volume and revenue |
|
In case growth has to be measured, then what are
the base figures to be? |
|
Criteria for dealing with returns, refunds,
exchanges should be clarified. |
|
|
|
|
Select your Awards: |
|
Are the awards to be cash? If so how paid? Taxed
or tax free? In paycheck (not recommended) or separately? |
|
Is it merchandise? What items? What value? Does
the winner want / value the gift? Any choice to winner? |
|
Is it a holiday? Group? Individual? Overseas?
Indian? Can wife and child accompany? Spending money? |
|
Is the award an individual award or is it a
group award for the team? |
|
|
|
|
In case of a team award what is the ratio to be
between team members? Or should all get the same value? If values have to
differ, is one restricted only to cash? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The design process must be transparent and all
stakeholders, through their reps given a chance to express their concerns |
|
The new goal-setting process must ensure a level
playing field and be perceived as fair |
|
All criteria should be easy to understand and
compute and economical to implement |
|
Systems should be set-up to inform sales reps of
the ongoing performance – their own and that of others. |
|
|
|
|
Explain, with the help of the task force
members, the details of the new goal setting and incentive scheme to all
stake holders. |
|
Examples should be worked out to demonstrate
earnings at various levels of performance so as to get the commitment of
sales managers and sales reps to the new scheme. |
|
|
|
|
Any new sales incentive plan MUST be announced
with a lot of fanfare and hype. A mere office memo or circular will just
not do |
|
First the senior managers are briefed in
totality about the plan, its implications, costs, caveats, goal setting
processes, review parameters, etc |
|
Then the sales managers and supervisors and
finally, the sales reps are briefed and information dockets individually
distributed to each person. |
|
|
|
|
The days when the sales teams’ goal was merely
to push sales are gone. In a heavily competitive situation the focus has
now shifted to customer satisfaction |
|
Many organisations have also changed their
nomenclature from Sales Reps to Merchandisers, Customer Care Executives,
Travel Advisors, Product Consultants, etc. |
|
|
|
|
In many companies, front line sales people book
no orders e.g. P&G, ITC, SKBGlaxo |
|
In ITC the sales people look after the 4 Ds |
|
- Distribution (availability at retail
outlets) |
|
- Display (stocks and POP materials) |
|
- Date (Freshness of perishable stocks) |
|
- Dented & Damaged (exchange of
unsaleable goods) |
|
Target achievement not easy to measure in such
cases: Process-based performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Already some companies are following new
approaches to incentives: |
|
Rewards are for teams and not for individuals |
|
Rewards are based on customer satisfaction
measures, not on sales (measured by outside agencies) |
|
Goal setting is done through an MBO type of
interactive exercise and is accompanied by a 360° appraisal / feedback
exercise. |
|
|
|
|
Whatever the goals and whatever the rewards
selected, just remember that sales people are competitive animals. They
must be given regular feedback of their status in the race vis-à-vis their
colleagues. Half the incentive in a race is lost if one cannot judge one’s
place in the race. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is hardly any published material on sales
contests prior to the 1980s. Since then a fair amount of work has been
done. |
|
Researchers have now examined the effectiveness
of the various forms of each of the elements that comprise a sales contest,
including: |
|
Goals |
|
Competitive format |
|
Number of potential winners |
|
Awards |
|
Duration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A salespersons’s expectancy, instrumentality and
valence estimates have a direct effect on attitude toward sales contests |
|
A salesperson’s perception of the congruence of
contest goals with the strategic goals of the territory also directly
affect the attitude |
|
Subjective norms, such as perceived social
pressures to participate in the sales contest, affect intentions to pursue
contest goals. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over the course of a contest, management uses
interim contest promotion and feedback to engender contest enthusiasm and
support |
|
Even for sales force members who are performing
poorly in a contest, management may be able to maintain enthusiasm and
commitment through proper interim contest promotion and feedback |
|
Finally, the endpoint performance determines the
winners at the end of the contest. |
|
|
|
|
Sales contest goals are either - |
|
Process based, or |
|
Outcome-based |
|
|
|
While outcome-based contests are more frequent,
some industries, particularly services prefer to use process-based contests |
|
Let us examine the pros and cons of both types
of contests. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pros: |
|
Easy to administer and understand |
|
Recognise that there can be varied routes to
success |
|
Accountability limited to end results only |
|
Appear more objective than behaviour-based goals |
|
Higher expectancy estimates by salespeople |
|
Associated with higher instrumentality of sales
staff |
|
Clarity in the performance to rewards
relationship. |
|
|
|
|
Cons: |
|
Can lead to malpractices like dumping, cycling,
bogus billing |
|
Lead to neglect of promotional efforts |
|
Can lead to queering relationships with
customers because of too much ‘hard-sell’ |
|
Not suitable for perishable products. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pros: |
|
Provide an opportunity to demonstrate
effectiveness on targeted skills / activities without need to gain revenue
/ volume - outcomes that are influenced by forces beyond their control |
|
Improvement in service quality, display, sales
promotion, etc, does eventually lead to increase in sales revenue |
|
Suitable for service industries where eventual
sales volumes are a result of various complex factors including service
delivery by someone other than the salesperson. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cons: |
|
Difficult to administer |
|
Judgment by managers can be subjective |
|
Reduce expectancy estimates since increases in
desired behaviours may not be observed |
|
Salespersons may feel a loss of control over the
linkages between performance and awards – reduced estimates of
instrumentality by them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are basically two types of competitive
formats: |
|
Individual |
|
Team |
|
Since team formats require that salespeople rely
on the performance of their peers to attain performance goals, salespeople
prefer the individual format as this has both higher expectancy and higher
instrumentality |
|
But there is a caveat … |
|
|
|
|
In some environments the norm of doing business
has teams of salespeople working with customers, an individual format is
likely to be inappropriate, even detrimental to productivity |
|
A team selling environment is established
because coordination between salespeople is essential to sales success |
|
Hence we cannot always use an individual format. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Again two types of contests prevail: |
|
Where everyone (or every team) has an
opportunity to win by attaining a certain performance goal; or |
|
Where only a predetermined number of persons can
win the award |
|
The first method is more prevalent, but studies
show that the second type is considered a better reward by the winners. |
|
|
|
|
Why is this so? |
|
Challenging but attainable goals may provide
better motivation for salespeople. These designs induce difficulty by
offering the win to only a percentage of the sales team |
|
The friendly competition of such schemes lends a
sense of excitement to the pursuit of the goals |
|
These designs heighten reward valences: the
prestige & recognition value is higher. |
|
|
|
|
Cash or cash equivalent is the most frequently
used award in sales contests. Its benefits are: |
|
The philosophy that cash always motivates |
|
The “true” value of the award is known to all |
|
The winner has flexibility to use the award in
any way he wants |
|
But cash has no lasting reminder value and often
gets frittered away by the recipient. Perceived value of merchandise or
travel awards is often higher. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At small values, cash may seem like “peanuts” to
salespeople but merchandise of comparable ‘retail price’, though bought
‘wholesale’ by the firm, will be more highly valued by the winner |
|
Merchandise has a greater lingering effect |
|
The winners get a chance to obtain items they
might not otherwise purchase on their own |
|
Even so, for merchandise to lead to higher award
valence, management may need to provide an ample selection of merchandise
from which winners select their award. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Travel awards have a perceived value even higher
than either merchandise or cash |
|
Travel awards, usually shared by winners,
spouses, and supervisory staff, provide an opportunity to enjoy the win
with other winners and seniors and give winners a chance to take a vacation
to destinations that might otherwise not be visited, and provide lasting
memories. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duration though not in itself a motivator is
definitely a hygiene factor |
|
Durations should not be shorter than the sales
cycle of targeted goals or else only pending sales would be relevant for
the contest and no new business could be initiated |
|
On the other hand, too long a time span, robs
the contest of any sense of urgency and makes salespeople complacent. |
|
|
|
|
The effect of subjective norms on intentions to
pursue the behaviours necessary to attain contest goals will be stronger
when organisational commitment is higher |
|
A strong relationship with a supervisor
strengthens the effects of subjective norms on the intention to pursue
contest goals. Those closer to their supervisors receive more attention and
greater support and so have greater motivation to engage in behaviours that
maintain and build this valued relationship. |
|
|
|
|
Many firms are today adopting sales practices
unfamiliar only a few years ago. These practices include team selling and
national account management, along with TQM and relationship management
principles. The implications of these changes on the use of sales contests
are not yet fully known. |
|
|
|
|
Murphy, Dacin. Sales Contests: A Research
Agenda. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Summer 98 Vol.
18 |
|
Ghosh. Experimental Evidence for Agency Models
of Salesforce Compensation. Marketing Science, Fall 2000 Vol. 19 |
|
Alonzo. Beyond Sales Quotas. Incentive, February
94, Vol.168 |
|
Feiertag. Sales Incentives. The Voice of
Foodservice Distribution, May 98 Vol. 34. |
|
|
|
|
|